KC Gaming Networks Limited

About Us

Betfred: Blackjack Player Wins ₤ 1.7 m Jackpot After High Court Battle

Betfred: Blackjack gamer wins ₤ 1.7 m prize after High Court battle

7 April 2021

A Betfred punter denied a ₤ 1.7 m prize over an alleged software application problem has won a legal battle to declare the winnings.

Andy Green, from Lincolnshire, scooped the prize in January 2018 while playing a blackjack video game on his phone.

The bookmaker refused to pay out, claiming the error implied the game was not operating effectively.

High Court judge Mrs Justice Foster ruled in Mr Green’s favour and stated the company had no grounds for .

The judgement means Mr Green, from Washingborough, will lastly get his payout, plus interest, after a three-year battle.

‘Champagne all set’

In a declaration, he stated the prolonged row over the yohaig code payment had made him wish he ‘d never won.

“Together with my family, I have actually been through some really low times and end up being extremely down,” he stated.

“My physical health has actually likewise suffered badly, and I in some cases wanted I ‘d never ever won this promotion code cash, due to the fact that it was simply making my life a suffering.

“But today, I feel like the world has been taken off my shoulders and I feel so exceptionally pleased and relieved – for me, my family and my legal team.

“The champagne can lastly come off ice and be savoured.”

Betfred apologised for the hold-up in Mr Green receiving his money and stated it would not appeal versus the ruling.

Speaking in 2018, he said he had gone “absolutely crazy” after scooping the prize on the yohaig code Frankie Dettori Magic Seven Blackjack game.

Following the win, he extended his overdraft and invested more than ₤ 2,500 celebrating with friends and family.

In her judgment, Mrs Justice Foster said when he later got in touch with Betfred they “did not seek at this promotion code point to suggest other than that he was a big winner”.

But a couple of days later on, a Betfred director called him to say there had actually been a “software application mistake” and it was turning down the claim.

Mr Green said he seemed like he had been kicked and had his “withins removed” after getting the call.

After he challenged the choice, the company at one phase used him ₤ 60,000 as a token of “goodwill” on the premises he concurred not to talk about it ever again, but he declined.

In-game loot boxes connected to issue gaming

A very gambling establishment in your pocket

Addiction fear over council-run lottery games

In April 2019 he took his case to the High Court aiming to sue Betfred and its moms and dad business, Gibraltar-based Petfre, for ₤ 2m, to include the interest he would have made from the win.

Betfred had actually argued that the software problem, which stopped the video game from resetting effectively while Mr Green was playing, was covered under the conditions of the game.

However, Mrs Justice Foster ruled that the phrasing of the clauses trust was “inadequate”, and “not transparent or reasonable and Betfred were not entitled to rely upon them”.

A Betfred representative stated: “Mr Green won the jackpot three times whilst playing a game supplied by one of our third-party suppliers.

“The provider reported a software application issue to us and recommended that we should withhold payment.

“However, we will follow the court’s choice and not appeal. We would like to apologise to Mr Green for the hold-up in receiving his cash.”

Mr Green’s legal representative Peter Coyle stated he was “thrilled” for his customer, adding that the yohaig code judgement would “give hope to others who may be thinking that the huge, rich guys always win”.

Follow BBC East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire on Facebook, external, Twitter, external, and Instagram, external. Send your story concepts to [email protected], external.

Washingborough

Man’s ₤ 1.7 m wagering ‘win’ battle goes to High Court

16 October 2020

Legal action over voided ₤ 1.7 m game win

20 November 2018